Project management
Kickoff, detailed implementation and rollout planning, biweekly reporting, milestone confirmations, pilot coordination, UAT, and a final closeout report.
The vision. The delivery plan.
Explore the working prototype and the delivery commitments behind it: testing with LAAC users, staff training, security, launch, and twelve months of support.
From concept to stewardship
Complete RFP coverage
Clear deliverables. Documented acceptance.
The final implementation plan would turn these commitments into LAAC-approved milestones, acceptance criteria, invoicing evidence, and grant-reporting confirmations.
Accessible website delivery
Responsive, cross-browser, scalable implementation with content migration, system configuration, data-security safeguards, and WCAG 2.2 AA as the target.
Testing with LAAC users
Volunteer testing, an identified pilot group, task-based success criteria, accessibility review, and documented UAT before launch.
Staff enablement
Virtual training, update workflows, role-aware administration, recorded sessions, and maintainable reference materials for future staff.
Twelve-month support
Defined response and resolution targets, bug fixes, security patches, functionality monitoring, and quarterly review meetings.
Search and stewardship
Content ownership, source and review dates, SEO and AI-search optimization, analytics, grant-ready deliverable records, and future-proof governance.
Evaluator view
Requirement by requirement. Proof beside promise.
This matrix separates what the interactive concept already demonstrates from what the contracted delivery process will document and govern.
RFP requirementVisible evidenceStatus
01Explain fellowship processes
Interactive structure comparison, candidate-host-funder responsibilities, planning sequences, materials, and official-source status
Visible02Describe fellowship alternatives
Direct employment, pre-bar, policy, community education, operations, and legal-support routes
Visible03Identify organizations hiring before bar admission
Structured pre-bar field, dedicated directory filter, profile disclosure, and organization verification boundary
Visible04Login-gated narrow AI matching
Protected-view sign-in concept, student profile, structured employer needs, visible reasons, consent boundaries, and human decisions
Visible05Match experience, skills, and interests to employer needs
Declared inputs, eligibility gates, transparent factors, missing-information prompts, and user-controlled recalculation
Visible06Resources for hiring organizations
Host-readiness checklist, opportunity builder, matching governance, recruiting workspace, and support routes
Visible07Career-services tool
Counselor conversation guide, planning calendar, organization discovery, responsible-matching guidance, and shareable resources
Visible08Kickoff and detailed rollout plan
Decision log, owner map, content inventory, implementation milestones, acceptance gates, and risk register
Governed09Biweekly progress reports
Every-other-week status packet with completed work, risks, decisions, budget, next actions, and grant evidence
Governed10Pilot and volunteer testing
Representative cohort plan for students, graduates, rural organizations, career services, and LAAC staff
Delivery plan11Documented UAT success criteria
Task completion, comprehension, accessibility, error recovery, content confidence, and signoff evidence
Delivery plan12Final closeout report
Accepted deliverables, outcomes, open risks, training record, source inventory, ownership transfer, and support transition
Governed13Integration, migration, and configuration
Content schema, migration inventory, field mapping, D1 and R2 boundaries, API validation, and LAAC-approved source connections
Delivery plan14Draft brand and functional review
Responsive art direction, page system, working role flows, and staff-feedback checkpoint before finalization
Visible15Cross-browser, UX, scale, and future-proofing
Standards-first interface, test matrix, modular content model, role governance, monitoring, and maintainable handoff
Governed16Virtual training, materials, and recordings
Role-based sessions, accessible recordings, quick-reference guides, admin runbooks, and future-staff onboarding material
Delivery plan17Twelve-month support and SLA
Severity targets, issue intake, bug fixes, security patches, functionality monitoring, and four quarterly reviews
Governed18ADA accessibility
WCAG 2.2 AA target, keyboard and focus support, reduced motion, accessible recovery, transcripts, and assistive-technology testing
Visible19Data security
Minimization, role boundaries, encryption expectations, audit events, incident response, breach notification, retention, and secure disposal
Governed20SEO and AI-search support for one year
Route metadata, structured data, semantic content, source freshness, analytics, Search Console, and monthly monitoring
Visible21Grant reporting and milestone invoicing
Deliverable register, acceptance confirmations, itemized milestone invoices, evidence links, and Net 30 approval trail
Governed22Confidentiality and work-product ownership
Confidential handling, safeguard obligations, return or destruction, LAAC ownership after payment, and technical handoff
GovernedProduction architecture
The website is the visible layer. The delivery system makes it dependable.
These workstreams turn the concept into an accessible, secure, maintainable LAAC platform rather than a one-time design handoff.
Migration and configuration
Inventory, normalize, map, migrate, redirect, validate, and assign an LAAC owner and review date to every production content type.
Compatibility and performance
Test current Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and Edge plus representative iOS and Android devices, slow networks, zoom, and reduced-motion states.
Security and privacy
Threat-model authentication, roles, exports, uploads, logging, retention, incident response, and vendor access before production data enters the system.
Maintainable operations
Give LAAC a governed admin experience, documented configuration, reusable components, source records, release notes, and a non-developer update path.
Staff enablement
Train the people who will own the platform.
Training is role-specific, recorded, accessible, and tied to the real workflows LAAC must maintain after launch.
Editors and program staff
Content and source stewardship
Live virtual session, accessible recording, source-review checklist, and quick guide
LAAC reviewers and member support
Organizations and opportunities
Verification, moderation, publishing, corrections, and escalation runbook
Program, admin, and leadership
Matching and privacy governance
Factor policy, simulation, consent, audit, incident, and fairness-review guide
Leadership and operations
Analytics, reporting, and support
Metric definitions, grant export, issue intake, quarterly review, and closeout materials
Proposed 12-month support baseline
Clear response targets. Quarterly improvement, not passive maintenance.
Final business hours, escalation contacts, and contractual remedies will be confirmed with LAAC during scope finalization.
SeverityExampleResponseResolution approach
CriticalSecurity incident or platform unavailable1 business hourContinuous coordination until contained or restored
HighCritical task blocked with no reasonable workaround4 business hoursTarget workaround in 1 business day
StandardDefect with a usable workaround1 business dayTarget resolution in 3 business days
AdvisoryContent, training, or enhancement request2 business daysScheduled with LAAC by priority and release window
01Q1 launch health + accessibility02Q2 search + content freshness03Q3 security + performance04Q4 outcomes + year-two roadmap
RFP-aligned timeline
From selection to a tested January launch.
- 01Award by October 31 · scope final by November 15
Mobilization and scope
Kickoff, stakeholder alignment, requirements, content inventory, security model, implementation plan, and decision calendar.
- 02Draft presented by December 1
Design and working draft
Art direction, information architecture, responsive prototype, matcher logic, configured content types, and first staff review.
- 03December through January 14
Pilot, UAT, and refinement
Volunteer testing, documented success criteria, accessibility and cross-browser validation, feedback resolution, training preparation, and launch readiness.
- 04Website finalized by January 15, 2027
Finalization and launch
Approved production configuration, migration validation, staff enablement, closeout evidence, ownership transfer, and support activation.
- 05Launch through month 12
Sustained support
SLA-backed maintenance, bug and security fixes, quarterly reviews, SEO and AI-search monitoring, functionality checks, and continuous improvement.
Contract and grant readiness
The operational terms are part of the product promise.
The accompanying proposal remains the controlling commercial document. This evaluator view makes the required contract, ownership, security, and reporting obligations visible in the product demonstration.
Independent contractor
Services performed as an independent contractor under the final LAAC agreement.
Confidentiality
Administrative, technical, and physical safeguards plus prompt suspected-breach reporting.
Insurance
Certificates for commercially reasonable general, professional, and workers' compensation coverage when applicable.
LAAC ownership
Project-specific deliverables, configuration, documentation, and content transfer to LAAC upon payment.
Grant compliance
Itemized invoices and deliverable confirmations aligned to the California Access to Justice Commission grant.
Milestone payment
Invoices tied to accepted deliverables, payable Net 30 from receipt of an approved invoice, with acceptance records retained.
Orderly transition
Closeout, return or destruction of confidential information, handoff, and termination support without platform lock-in.
Grant evidence packetEvery milestone leaves an approval trail.
Accepted deliverableNamed LAAC approverCompletion dateEvidence link or artifactItemized invoice lineOpen risks and follow-upProposal companion checklist
The product proof is ready. The submission must be just as complete.
These vendor-specific facts belong in the required single-PDF proposal, not inside the public product. They are shown here so no evaluation requirement is mistaken for a website feature or left behind.
Executive summary
The proposed services, components, outcomes, and LAAC-specific value in one concise opening.
Approach and timeline
Method, workstreams, milestones, decision points, testing, training, launch, and the one-year support period.
Itemized pricing
A fixed first-year maximum of $30,000, split across licensing, implementation, training, support, and recurring fees.
Company profile
Legal name, ownership, address, taxpayer information, staff size, years in business, and recent nonprofit client count.
Key personnel
Named delivery team, roles, allocation, relevant qualifications, and continuity coverage.
Three references
Named client, title, contact details, scope relevance, and nonprofit or legal-sector context where available.
Similar projects
Selected websites with comparable purpose, users, complexity, accessibility, governance, or mission context.
Terms and certifications
Any contract exceptions plus the authority, independent pricing, no-gratuity, confidentiality, and RFP-understanding assurances.
Submission controlSingle PDF attachmentDue September 15, 2026Subject: Web Development RFP ProposalLAAC recipients verified before sending
Find a route that fits your career stage.
Build my pathwayProposed acceptance evidence / RFP §4
A clear task. A reviewable result.
These are proposed pilot scenarios, not completed user tests. LAAC approves the tasks and criteria before testing and signs off after reviewing results and resolving launch blockers.
01Student summer discovery
- Task
- Select 2L, confirm summer availability, and compare a host.
- Proposed success criteria
- The selected stage persists. The reviewer can explain a recommendation and one requirement.
- Evidence to collect
- Student task notes; recorded inputs and expected results; unresolved barriers.
- Review roles
- LAAC-selected student volunteer and program reviewer
- Approval checkpoint
- LAAC confirms criteria before the pilot and accepts the documented result before the corresponding milestone closes.
02Before-bar clarity
- Task
- Inspect a graduate role and identify the facts still requiring confirmation.
- Proposed success criteria
- The reviewer distinguishes sample requirements from verified terms and locates supervision and study questions.
- Evidence to collect
- Comprehension notes; content-source review; corrections before signoff.
- Review roles
- Recent graduate and LAAC content reviewer
- Approval checkpoint
- LAAC confirms criteria before the pilot and accepts the documented result before the corresponding milestone closes.
03Employer preparation
- Task
- Reuse profile fields and prepare a complete example opportunity.
- Proposed success criteria
- Shared fields transfer accurately; role-specific terms are reviewed; no demo action publishes a real vacancy.
- Evidence to collect
- Field mapping; task completion; errors and recovery notes.
- Review roles
- Participating rural employer and LAAC program staff
- Approval checkpoint
- LAAC confirms criteria before the pilot and accepts the documented result before the corresponding milestone closes.
04Career-services advising
- Task
- Use the guide to help a fictional student choose a next action.
- Proposed success criteria
- The advisor can identify a relevant route, preparation resource, and source to check.
- Evidence to collect
- Advising-session observations; missing-information list; revised guidance.
- Review roles
- Law-school career-services reviewer
- Approval checkpoint
- LAAC confirms criteria before the pilot and accepts the documented result before the corresponding milestone closes.
05Staff independence
- Task
- Edit, verify, approve, inspect the public preview, and restore a revision as draft.
- Proposed success criteria
- The public sample matches the approved revision. Restoration cannot bypass approval.
- Evidence to collect
- Revision history; keyboard walkthrough; staff task notes; remediation record.
- Review roles
- LAAC editor and designated acceptance lead
- Approval checkpoint
- LAAC confirms criteria before the pilot and accepts the documented result before the corresponding milestone closes.
The milestone evidence packet
For each milestone: delivered work and version, acceptance criteria, test or review records, open issues, LAAC’s acceptance confirmation, and the matching itemized invoice. Training records and the final handoff inventory join the closeout packet.
Biweekly progress reports connect completed work, decisions, risks, and next steps. Records support LAAC’s grant reporting; funding-body acceptance is not guaranteed.
Inspect the sample reporting workspace →