Rural Justice Summer Law Clerk
Needs eligibility confirmation
Interest: Housing · Interest: Rural justice · Preference: rural serviceInspect requirements and reasons →Responsible recommendation controls
Make the reasoning visible.
Test a declared preference against synthetic records. Eligibility remains a required gate.
ONE CONNECTED COMPARISONYour choices.
Your choices.
Visible reasons.
This example uses the same student profile and matching logic as the workspace. Required criteria are checked first; preference overlap orders the remaining examples.
Current sample: 2L student · Housing, Rural justice
2examples remain after confirmed exclusions. 2 need a required detail confirmed.
Immigrant Justice Law Clerk
Needs eligibility confirmation
No preference overlap declaredInspect requirements and reasons →Inspect the comparison method
Career stage and summer availability are example requirements. Explicitly unmet requirements exclude a role; unknown requirements are shown separately. Within each group, count declared interest, skill, experience, location, rural, and language overlaps equally, with stable ID ordering for ties. These are explanatory signals, not probabilities or measured hiring suitability.
No AI service is running in this demonstration. Production matching would use an LAAC-approved, narrow service behind authenticated access.
Excluded from matching
Race and ethnicity, gender, age, disability, photographs, full names, school prestige and unstructured culture fit are excluded. Recommendations support discovery; people remain responsible for hiring decisions. Production edits require change notes, simulation, approval, and an audit event.
Review matching policy